COVID-19 Update – Our firm is fully operational. Read the Latest
Department of Labor Clarifies Scope of FLSA’s Administrative Exemption https://t.co/dfuTqKyVWk
On June 25th, DOL issued FLSA 2020-9 in response to whether county emergency-management coordinators qualify for ad… https://t.co/xzIrx96uyn
Department of Labor Clarifies Scope of FLSA’s Administrative Exemption https://t.co/nA6Syo50D5 https://t.co/n8M6qcSfHz
The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) recently released its Declaratory Ruling and Order regarding the requirements of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (the “TCPA”). The FCC Order provides some good news for financial institutions, exempting certain automated calls to cell phones and text messages from the prior express consent requirement.
Here’s what you need to know:
Under the TCPA, the general rule is that calls made with an automated telephone dialing system to cell phones, automated messages to cell phones and text messages all require the recipient’s prior express consent. The FCC Order exempts from the consumer consent requirements certain pro-consumer calls which are made about time sensitive financial matters so long as they are made free to the end user and do not count against the recipient’s plan minutes or texts. Specifically, the exemption applies to:
Recognizing that such situations require immediate attention and it may be damaging to the customer if the financial institution is prohibited from contacting the customer for lack of prior express consent, the FCC concluded that financial institutions may call or text a customer’s cellular phone number to notify him of possible fraudulent activity on his account.
Recognizing the need for expediency in the event of a data breach, the FCC held that it is in the best interest of consumers to receive immediate notification of such an occurrence regardless of whether the consumer provided prior express consent.
When a customer’s personal and financial account information is at risk following a data breach, financial institutions seek to inform the customer of measures he can take to prevent identity theft. Thus, the FCC exempted such calls from the express consent requirement. The FCC, however, cautioned financial institutions that informing a customer of an instance of identity theft or measures to prevent identity theft does not include marketing products a customer may use to prevent or remedy identity theft.
Financial institutions want to have the ability to notify the recipient of a money transfer of steps to be taken in order to receive the transferred funds; however, money transfers must often be delivered to individuals who do not have a relationship with the transferring institution and, therefore, have not even had the opportunity to consent to calls or text messages from the financial institution. Based on the fact that both the transferring and receiving party have an interest in the details and status of the money transfer, combined with the time-sensitive nature of money transfers, the FCC granted the exemption to notifications regarding actions needed to arrange for receipt of a money transfer.
The FCC’s exemption is not unfettered, and financial institutions seeking to take advantage of the exemption must comply with the limitations imposed by the FCC Order:
Frequency of Calls:
The FCC ruling provides that a single financial institution may call or message a customer, who has not given their prior express consent, no more than three (3) times over a three-day (3) period. These limits apply per event warranting the exempted calls, regardless of which exemption is triggered. Any contact beyond the limited number of three (3) calls or messages per event, over a three-day period, is not exempt and requires the express consent of the consumer.
Financial institutions must include in their message a method for recipients to easily opt out of future calls and messages. Voice calls that could be answered by a live person must include an automated, interactive voice and/or key press-activated opt-out mechanism that enables the call recipient to make an opt-out request prior to terminating the call, voice calls that could be answered by an answering machine or voice mail service must include a toll-free number that the consumer can call to opt out of future financial calls, text messages must inform recipients of the ability to opt out by replying “STOP,” which will be the exclusive means by which consumers may opt out of such messages
If the customer chooses to opt out of future calls, the opt-out request should not opt the customer out of receiving all financial calls for that account. As such, the financial institution should customize the opt-out provision so that a customer is aware that a decision to opt out of future calls from the financial institution is specific only to the category of exemption referenced in that message or call. Financial institutions are required to honor opt-out requests immediately.
Call Content Requirements:
The FCC ruling provides much needed exemptions related to urgent financial matters, but caution should be used by financial institutions seeking to take advantage of the exemptions. First and foremost, financial institutions needs to keep in mind that this is not a blanket exemption. All calls and texts must be free to the end user and not count against the recipient’s plan minutes or texts. The ability to use the exemption, therefore, will require financial institutions to work closely with wireless carriers and third party servicers to insure the messages and notices do not result in a charge to the recipient. Secondly, content and frequency of calls must likewise be closely monitored as the exemption will be tightly enforced. Failure to strictly comply, therefore could result in costly litigation.
Caren Enloe leads Smith Debnam’ s consumer financial services litigation and compliance group. In her practice, she defends consumer financial service providers and members of the collection industry in state and federal court, as well as in regulatory matters involving a variety of consumer protection laws. Caren also advises fintech companies, law firms, and collection agencies regarding an array of consumer finance issues. An active writer and speaker, Caren currently serves as chair of the Debt Collection Practices and Bankruptcy subcommittee for the American Bar Association’s Consumer Financial Services Committee. She is also a member of the Defense Bar for the National Creditors Bar Association, the North Carolina State Chair for ACA International’s Member Attorney Program and a member of the Bank Counsel Committee of the North Carolina Bankers Association. Most recently, she was elected to the Governing Committee for the Conference on Consumer Finance Law. In 2018, Caren was named one of the “20 Most Powerful Women in Collections” by Collection Advisor, a national trade publication. Caren oversees a blog titled: Consumer Financial Services Litigation and Compliance dedicated to consumer financial services and has been published in a number of publications including the Journal of Taxation and Regulation of Financial Institutions, California State Bar Business Law News, Banking and Financial Services Policy Report and Carolina Banker. ...LEARN MORE