Recording an upcoming podcast on Opportunity Zones w/ Lauren Reeves and @TheRealEWC https://t.co/muS0C4PhVk
RT @MidtownRAL: @DukeRaleigh @HoltBrothersInc @CiiTechSolution @MerzUSA @SmithDebnamLaw @capitalbankus @ZaytounOrtho Thanks for giving us P…
RT @Gilmanbp: Another #PrimerusGlobal Conference; another new airport friend well-met @RDUAirport . San Diego bound @SmithDebnamLaw https:…
A debt collection agency did not violate § 1692g(b)’s 30-day validation period by sending two letters demanding payment and offering settlement terms during… Read More
A single missed call from a telemarketer constitutes a concrete injury that gives rise to standing, a federal district court in California has… Read More
In the Spring 2018 Consumer Financial Services Update, Smith Debnam examines recent consumer financial services litigation cases taking place across the U.S., providing banks… Read More
The FDCPA, through section 1692d(6), prohibits a debt collector from placing telephone calls to a debtor “without meaningful disclosure of the caller’s identity.”… Read More
Sign up here for the latest news from Smith Debnam.